Using Timelines to Diagnose Problems in Career Planning
Katherine Hartmann, MD, PhD
Translating intended goals into a single simple image as a timeline is a powerful tool for staying on track.
2
Comments
14
Likes
8361
Views
Scholarly Activities for a Remote Research Lab
Two Peds in a Blog, MD, PhD
What meaningful activities can we perform given the inability to physically meet or be in our lab? Here are some ideas.
0
Comments
14
Likes
2091
Views
Working at Home: Academics During the Plague Edition
Fighty Squirrel, PhD, Awe.Some.
It's time to do your weaponized bat experiments, people.
1
Comments
13
Likes
850
Views
Introverts Can Network, Too!
Alvin Jeffery, PhD, RN
Do you consider yourself an introvert? Do you get anxious thinking about how to meet new colleagues? Check out these tips shared from a fellow introvert...
3
Comments
13
Likes
1295
Views
Not All Pandemic Heroes Wear Capes: Science Help for Homebound Kids
Fighty Squirrel, PhD, Awe.Some.
There is no better time to convince folks that science is essential. Here are some heroes who are taking lessons to families online.
0
Comments
13
Likes
396
Views
Coming Soon: Biostatistics Action & Adventure
The Edge for Scholars
A wake-up call to use modern biostatistical methods
3
Comments
12
Likes
1363
Views
OCD in the Time of COVID-19
David Sacks, PhD
There’s plenty of the “O” and the “C,” but none of the “D.”
1
Comments
12
Likes
302
Views
Three (Grant) Peeves in a Pod: Check Yourself
Cranky Reviewer
Reviewers review. We will notice. These fresh mistakes straight from study section: 1.) Please agree with yourself. If the abstract says n = 110, the aims say 100, the statistical section says 110, and the …
0
Comments
12
Likes
521
Views
Live Beneath Your Means
Katherine Hartmann, MD, PhD
“I don’t want to miss the details of the resurrection. You always said becoming a division head would happen over your dead body, what gives?” After some warm-up, the …
0
Comments
12
Likes
686
Views
Finally! Data on What Study Section Really Cares About
Fighty Squirrel, PhD, Awe.Some.
Nine years ago, NIH revamped their scoring system asking reviewers to provide numbers ranging from 1 (best) to 9 (worst) assessing applications Environment, Investigator, Innovation, Approach, and Significance. NIH has emphasized Innovation (…
0
Comments
12
Likes
1851
Views